Slippery Slope: What It Is and How to Respond to It

  A slippery slope is an argument which claims that an initial action could lead to a chain of events with an extreme result, or that if we treat one case a certain way then we’ll have to treat more extreme cases the same way too. For example, a slippery slope argument might claim that …

Read more

Cherry Picking: When People Ignore Evidence that They Dislike

  Cherry picking is a logical fallacy where someone focuses only on evidence that supports their stance, while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. For example, a person who engages in cherry picking might mention only a small selection of studies out of all the ones available on a certain topic, to make it look as if …

Read more

The Appeal to Emotion Fallacy: Arguing Through Feelings Rather than Facts

  The appeal to emotion is a logical fallacy that involves manipulating people’s emotions to strengthen their support for the conclusion of an unsound argument (e.g., one that’s misleading or baseless). For example, a person using an appeal to emotion in a debate might encourage the audience to ignore certain, by trying to make the …

Read more

The Credentials Fallacy: What It Is and How to Respond to It

  The credentials fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone dismisses an argument by stating that whoever made it doesn’t have proper credentials, so their argument must be wrong or unimportant. For example, if a person raises concerns about a political policy, someone using the credentials fallacy might dismiss those concerns without addressing …

Read more

False Authority: When People Rely on the Wrong Experts

  A false authority is someone whose supposed authority in a certain domain is substantially flawed, generally because their credentials or expertise are irrelevant, dubious, insufficient, or missing entirely. For example, an actor who promotes a medical product despite having no medical training can be considered a false authority, because they lack relevant credentials or …

Read more

The Fallacy Fallacy: Why Fallacious Arguments Can Have True Conclusions

  The fallacy fallacy (also known as the argument from fallacy) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that if an argument contains a logical fallacy, then its conclusion must be false. For example, if someone fallaciously claimed that a certain medical treatment is preferable to alternatives because it’s more “natural”, the fallacy …

Read more

Red Herring: Using Irrelevant Information as a Distraction

  A red herring is a piece of information that’s meant to distract people from something important in a misleading manner. Red herrings are usually used either as a literary device, such as when an author uses a side character to divert attention from another character, or as a rhetoric technique, such as when someone …

Read more

The Divine Fallacy: When People Assume that God Must Be the Explanation

  The divine fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that a certain phenomenon must occur as a result of divine intervention or a supernatural force, either because they don’t know how to explain it otherwise, or because they can’t believe that this isn’t the case. For example, if someone doesn’t understand how …

Read more