The Picard Principle: It Is Possible to Commit No Mistakes and Still Lose

 

The Picard principle is the adage that “It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life.” This principle denotes that even if you follow the best course of action available to you, you can sometimes still end up with a negative outcome, such as failure to achieve your goals.

The Picard principle is important in many areas of life, so it’s worth understanding it properly. As such, in the following article you will learn more about this principle, and see how you can use it in practice.

 

Examples of the Picard principle

An example of the Picard principle is that you can submit a strong application for something like a job or a scholarship, and then get rejected because the person who assessed your application already had a preferred candidate in mind.

Another example of this principle appears in poker, where you can make the optimal play mathematically (i.e., the one that’s most likely to win) but still lose, for instance if you bet high on a strong initial hand but then lose to someone who got lucky after an initial bad hand.

Finally, another example of the Picard principle is that you can study hard for a test and still do badly, because the material for the test is much beyond your current abilities, or because the instructor designed the test poorly.

 

Potential benefits and dangers of the Picard principle

Accounting for the Picard principle can benefit you in various ways, since it can:

  • Help you assess situations more rationally. For example, this principle can help you debias irrational just-world beliefs that you have, by illustrating that people’s actions—including yours—don’t always lead to consequences that are fair from a moral perspective.
  • Help you cope with negative outcomes. For example, this principle can help you internalize that just because you failed to achieve something, that doesn’t mean that you did anything wrong, which can help you express more self-compassion. This, in turn, can also help you get over negative outcomes that you’ve experienced, as well as over negative emotions that are associated with these outcomes, such as guilt or shame.
  • Motivate you to take action. For example, this principle can push you to overcome the fear of failure, by helping you accept that there are certain factors outside your control, and that you should therefore just take a chance and focus on what you can control.

However, the Picard principle can also cause some issues, which are important to be aware of. Most notably, it can:

  • Hinder your development and growth. For example, this can happen if you use this principle as justification whenever something goes wrong, without considering whether you made any mistakes, and without taking responsibility for your actions.
  • Cause negative emotions. For example, this can happen if thinking about this principle makes you frustrated or angry at the unfairness of life.
  • Demotivate you. For example, this can happen if thinking about this principle makes you feel helpless and as if there’s no point in trying.

The effects of the Picard principle depend on various factors, such as who is using it, why, how, and in what context. It’s important to consider these factors when deciding whether and how to use this principle yourself, to make sure that doing it is more beneficial than harmful, and to make sure that if you do use it, then you do so in the best way possible.

In summary, the Picard principle has various potential benefits, including helping you assess situations more rationally, cope with negative emotions, and feel more motivated to take action. However, it also has potential dangers, including hindering personal development, causing negative emotions, and serving as a demotivator. The effects of the Picard principle depend on various factors—such as the reason for using this principle—which are important to consider when deciding whether and how to use this principle.

 

How to use the Picard principle

Before using the Picard principle, you should first assess the situation, to determine whether using this principle is a good idea (i.e., whether it will likely be more beneficial than harmful), and if so, what’s the best way to use it (i.e., how you can maximize its benefits while minimizing its dangers). When doing this, you should consider factors such as the context in which you’ll be using this principle, and your reason for using it.

If you’ve determined that using this principle is a good idea, then the key way to do so is to simply remind yourself that it’s possible to make no mistakes and still lose, meaning that even if you follow the best course of action available to you, you can sometimes still end up with a negative outcome. To help yourself internalize this, you can also do the following:

  • Think of relevant examples that support this principle (e.g., cases where a role model of yours did everything right and still lost).
  • Remind yourself that the universe doesn’t automatically reward things such as effort. In this context, two useful concepts to keep in mind are the just-world hypothesis, which causes people to assume that people’s actions always lead to fair consequences, and the hard work fallacy, which occurs when someone assumes that outcomes must necessarily be proportional to the effort someone puts in, so if they make an effort they will receive correspondingly positive outcomes.
  • Use cognitive debiasing techniques to help you assess situations more rationally, for example by considering what advice you would give to a friend if they were in your situation.

In addition, when it comes to dealing with situations where the Picard principle applies, you can also do the following:

  • Focus on what you can control, rather than what you can’t.
  • Focus on what you did right.
  • Focus on what you can learn from your experiences, even if those experiences are negative.
  • Use debiasing techniques that reduce helplessness and pessimism, such as changing your attributional style to avoid overestimating how long negative outcomes will affect you for.
  • Use lessons from stoicism to cope with negative emotions, for example by remembering that “The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts”.

Finally, note that you can also use a similar approach to help others implement the Picard principle. You can do this in various ways, such as by teaching them about this principle, helping them use this principle, or guiding their use of this principle by asking them questions that help them internalize it (e.g., “Was there anything you could have done better, given what you knew at the time?”).

 

Origin of the Picard principle

The quote “It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life.” comes from the TV series Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 2, episode 21—Peak Performance). In the episode, Captain Jean-Luc Picard, after whom the Picard principle is named, shares this adage with Data, an android who serves as an officer on Picard’s starship, when Data is disheartened after losing a match in a strategy game.

This adage has been shared as an inspirational quote in various media. However, the present article (published here on May 2024) coined the name of the associated principle, and developed the guidelines for implementing it.

Note: Another principle that’s attributed to Star Trek’s Picard by one source is the Picard Principle of Intercultural Communication, which is the adage that “Communication is a matter of patience [and] imagination.” In addition, there is also an unrelated Picard principle in mathematics.

 

Summary and conclusions

  • The Picard principle is the adage that “It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life.”
  • This principle denotes that even if you follow the best course of action available to you, you can sometimes still end up with a negative outcome, such as failure to achieve your goals.
  • An example of the Picard principle is that you can submit a strong application for a job, and get rejected because the person who assessed the application already had a preferred candidate in mind.
  • This principle can help you assess situations more rationally and cope with negative emotions, for instance when you would otherwise criticize yourself too harshly for a failure that wasn’t your fault.
  • The risks of this principle are that it can lead you to avoid taking responsibility in cases where you should, and that it can cause feelings of frustration and helplessness.